Journal of the Operations Research Society of China ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1): 227-267.doi: 10.1007/s40305-023-00479-z

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  

  • 收稿日期:2022-08-10 修回日期:2023-02-20 出版日期:2025-03-30 发布日期:2025-03-20
  • 通讯作者: Xiao-Hui Yu,Ping Wang,Qiang Zhang E-mail:yuxiaohui513@163.com;wangping@bpi.edu.cn;qiangzhang@bit.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 72171024 and 71801016), in part by 2022 annual project of the Beijing Municipal Education Commission’s support plan for the construction of the faculty of Beijing municipal universities (No. BPHR202203154), the Beijing Municipal Commissions and Offices Foundation of China (No. 2019Z005-001-KWY), and E-commerce Teaching Innovation Team (No. CJGX2022-026-002).

The Effect of Retailer’ Social Responsibility and Government Subsidy on the Performance of Low-Carbon Supply Chain

Ping Wang1, Xiao-Hui Yu2, Qiang Zhang3   

  1. 1 School of Economics and Management, Beijing Polytechnic, Beijing 100176, China;
    2 Institute for Carbon Peak and Neutrality and Logistics School, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China;
    3 School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2022-08-10 Revised:2023-02-20 Online:2025-03-30 Published:2025-03-20
  • Contact: Xiao-Hui Yu,Ping Wang,Qiang Zhang E-mail:yuxiaohui513@163.com;wangping@bpi.edu.cn;qiangzhang@bit.edu.cn

Abstract: Based on the cap-and-trade regulation, the effect of retailer’s social responsibility and subsidy are analyzed in a two-level low-carbon supply chain. The government subsidizes manufacturer to encourage low-carbon technological innovation. It is gotten that both retailer’s social responsibility and subsidy can improve the profit of manufacturer and reduce the carbon emission level. Although more subsidies to manufacturer indeed may decrease the profit of retailer, it is good measure to promote the centralized decision-making between the retailer and manufacturer. A certain retailer’s social responsibilities are good for the carbon emission reduction, but it also brings about the decline of profit in the supply chain. The centralized decision-making is always the best choice strategy for the carbon emission reduction, while in the decentralized decision-making situation, the retailer has more possibilities to care about social responsibility.

Key words: Social welfare, Subsidy, Cooperation, Carbon emission, Game

中图分类号: